Southern Pacific Company V Arizona - The case arose when several railroads. Santa Clara County v.
Steam And Diesel Locomotives Train Locomotive Train Tracks
Of American railroads in attacking the state law.
Southern pacific company v arizona. Dr Bipin Adhikari Constitutional Law - SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. Hundreds eventually joined the Freedom Rides movement. 394 is a corporate law case of the United States Supreme Court concerning taxation of railroad properties.
It sought to recover these penalties from Southern Pacific Co but the trial court made detailed factual findings that led it to conclude that Southern Pacific was not liable because the law violated the Commerce Clause. Appealed to the United States Supreme Court. The Emancipation Proclamation January 1 1863.
Thereupon the state of Arizona instituted this suit in a Superior Court of that state to recover the amount of the fine. STATE OF ARIZONA ex rel. Arizona 1945 in which the Court found that.
These are the 13 who started it all. The case is most notable for a headnote stating that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment grants constitutional protections to corporations. Railroad appealed to SCOTUS arguing that state law placed an undue burden on the flow of interstate commerce.
Southern pacific joined with the US govt. The Plaintiff the state of Arizona Plaintiff created a law limiting the number of railroad cars per trains as a safety measure. Southern Pacific Railroad Company 118 US.
The Defendant the Southern Pacific Co. In 1940 the State of Arizona brought suit in the Arizona Superior Court against appellant the Southern Pacific Company to recover the statutory penalties for operating within the state two interstate trains one a passenger train of more than fourteen cars and one a freight train of more than seventy cars. Other articles where Southern Pacific Co.
Submitted March 13 1919. Whether a shipment was at a given time interstate is a question of fact. Carter Fort of Washington DC for appellant.
Subsequently by the act of March 3 1871 congress incorporated the Texas Pacific Railroad Company with power to construct and maintain a continuous railroad and telegraph line from Marshall in the state of Texas to a point at or near El Paso thence through New Mexico and Arizona to San Diego pursuing as near as might be the thirty-second parallel of latitude. Argued March 26 27 1945. The Arizona Train Limit Law of 1912 prohibited operating railroad trains of more than a prescribed length.
March 26 27 1945. In its answer to the complaint of the state the Southern Pacific Company alleged. Decided April 14 1919.
Arizona law could be justified as a safety measure under the states police power. Supreme Court on 27 and 28 March 1945. Abecause the law did not concern a legitimate state interest to improve transportation safety Bbecause Congress.
Home LAW Protected. In May 1961 13 men and women boarded a bus in Washington DC bound for New Orleans to celebrate. 761 1945 Arizona prohibited operation of a railroad train more than fourteen passenger cars or seventy freight cars long.
472 1919 Southern Pacific Co. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the State of Arizona. Arizona imposed a monetary penalty on railroad companies operating trains of over 14 passenger cars or 70 freight cars.
USA TODAY via Yahoo News 6 months ago. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA Syllabus. Appeal To The Us.
Decided June 18 1945. The Supreme Court 72 held the law an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce. SULLIVAN Attorney General of Arizona.
Reducing the length of the trains was said to increase safety because of less slack action which caused trains to. Southern Pacific CovArizona concerned whether Arizona couldfor safety considerations Require trains traveling through the state be a shorter length than trains traveling through other statesThe Supreme Court justified striking down the Arizona law because. Contributor Names Stone Harlan Fiske Judge Supreme Court of the United States Author Created Published 1944 Subject Headings.
On this second rule a hearing was had and the company was adjudged in contempt and fined 1500 which it refused to pay. State power to regulate the length of railroad trains is not curtailed or superseded by 1 of the Interstate Commerce Act paragraphs 117 of itself and in the absence of. In 1940 the State of Arizona brought suit in the Arizona Superior Court against appellant the Southern Pacific Company to recover the statutory penalties for operating within the state two interstate trains one a passenger train of more than fourteen cars and one a freight train of more than seventy cars.
761 1945 Southern Pacific Co. The railroad appealed the Arizona courts decision before the US. In 1940 the State of Arizona brought suit in the Arizona Superior Court against appellant the Southern Pacific Company to recover the statutory penalties for operating within the state two interstate trains one a passenger train of more than fourteen cars and one a freight train of more than seventy cars.
Interpretation of the commerce clause in United States Supreme Court casesaffirmed and expanded upon in Southern Pacific Co. The state of Arizona continued to insist that the limit law was a public safety regulation. Burton Mason of San Francisco Cal and J.
The trial court agreed with Southern Pacific but the court of appeals reversed. The Freedmens Bureau Act 1865. 761 1945In deciding whether a state law created for its safety measures.
Defendant asserted that the law violated the United States Constitutions Constitution Commerce Clause. The Pennsylvania Gradual Abolition Act 1780. Southern Pacific brought suit against Sullivan defendant the Attorney General of Arizona alleging that the Arizona state law was an unconstitutional restriction on interstate commerce.
Choo Choo Mylespaul Com Train Pictures Train Engines Train Tracks
Sp 4 6 2 Engine No 2424 Central Pacific Railroad Train Layouts Pacific
Streamliners At Spencer Up 949 Union Pacific Emd E9 A At Spencer North Carolina By Matt Donnelly Train Model Trains Train Tracks
As Part Of The Celebration Of Los Angeles Union Passenger Terminal S 50th Anniversary Cab Units From The Three Original Tenant R Train Train Museum Old Trains
Atsf 3751 Atchison Topeka Santa Fe Atsf Steam 4 8 4 At Fullerton California By Charles Freericks Scenic Railroads Santa Fe Atchison
Southern Pacific Train Tracks Railroad Pictures Train Pictures
844 4449 Union Pacific 844 Union Pacific Railroad Steam Trains
Southern Pacific Railroad Alco C628 Diesel Electric Locomotive In San Jose California Usa Diesel Locomotive Railroad Photography Abandoned Train
Pin By Bart Mclellan On Espee Train Pictures Railroad Photos Diesel Locomotive
Mashed Nosed Ex U25b Work Train Railroad Photos Train Tracks
Railpictures Net Photo Sp 2731 Southern Pacific Railroad Emd Mp15ac At Kansas City Kansas By Roger Lalon Railroad Photography Train Wallpaper Railroad Photos
Railpictures Net Photo Sp 292 Southern Pacific Railroad Ge Ac4400cw At East Portal Colorado By Mike Danneman Pacific Railroad Southern
Pin On Train Scenery
Railpictures Net Photo Sp 4449 Southern Pacific Railroad Steam 4 8 4 At Portland Oregon By Andrew Rapacz Steam Train Photo Steam Railroad Photography
